HD Genetic Testing

Genetic Testing For HD~An Essay
Home | Index
Darmouth College
Biology 4: Dealing With Genes
1997 Winter Term
Term Projects - selected essays

Genetic Testing For Huntington's Disease
by Lindsey Sternberg
 
A shadow of love
doesn't have arms to embrace you,
to make you feel wanted and secure.
It only blocks out
the warmth of what could be.

-Jean Miller, a woman whose daughter
Kelly died of Huntington's Disease
A  woman stares pensively out her bedroom window. Today is her twenty-seventh birthday. Most people have the whole rest of their lives to look forward to when staring out the window at this age, but not Sylvia. She isn't sure. Ten years ago her mother was diagnosed with Huntington's Disease, a late-onset genetic disorder, and Sylvia was forced to watch her mother deteriorate to the point where she could no longer take care of herself.

Sylvia and her brother had to put their mother in a home. Now Sylvia faces a lot of decisions and dilemmas. She has recently married. Now, she and her husband are trying to decide whether or not to have children, and the local hospital just hired her as a physician's assistant.

But how long does she have until she begins to deteriorate like her mother? Or maybe she is the lucky one; maybe she didn't inherit this gene from her mother. There are many uncertainties in her future right now. There is one way to erase these uncertainties, and that is predictive testing for Huntington's disease. But is this the right choice for her?

Huntington's Disease is an autosomal dominant degenerative disorder of the central nervous system. This means that if either parent has the disease there is at least a fifty percent chance that the offspring will develop the disease. There is complete penetrance, so all who have the disease will develop symptoms. It is a late-onset genetic disorder in which symptoms begin to appear in the late thirties or early forties. There are some cases however of juvenile or geriatric Huntington's Disease. There is currently no cure, so to those who develop the disease, it is lethal.

The most characteristic feature, and the symptom which is used to first diagnosis Huntington's, is chorea. Chorea can be characterized by a series of tics affecting the face and limbs. In more advanced Huntington's the chorea turns into athetosis or dystonia in which the affected person experiences a "writhing quality" (Furtado 7).

There are other characteristics of this deadly disease too in which the patient slowly loses control of all involuntary movements. Eye movement abnormalities are sometimes excessive blinking or gazing.

There are psychological and sexual changes as well as cognitive dysfunction and a decline of memory. Patients usually become irritable, impulsive, and highly suspicious of others. They also experience depression, become anti-social, and develop delusional thinking. There is a high suicide rate among those with Huntington's, but there is a discrepancy about whether it is because of the depression, or because the disease is emotionally painful and lethal without any hope of recovery. As far as sexual activity is concerned, people either become hyper-sexual, hypo-sexual, or take part in exhibitionism.

Reduction in number of words produced, difficulty in comprehension and articulation as well as visuospatial problems are some of the cognitive dysfunctions.

Recognition memory in patients with this disease is usually normal, but remote memory in which people try to recall the past, or even the present, is what is affected by the disease (Furtado 8).

Huntington's is an awful disease that takes control of the brain and causes slow atrophy until death, but luckily it is a rare disease. Only one in ten thousand people are affected. One hundred and fifty thousand relatives of Huntington's patients are at risk, but the only way to tell whether they have inherited the mutant gene or not is by the duration of time or by predictive testing (Saltus 1).

So what is predictive testing?

Predictive testing is a type of genetic testing for late-onset disorders. These types of tests give information on the genetic makeup of the individual and let him or her know if they have the mutant gene responsible for causing the disease.

These tests "predict" the future of the patient. Individuals who wish to be tested may if there is a history of the disease in the family, the person is already showing symptoms of the disorder, or if the person is afraid of passing the gene onto his or her children.

The Human Genome Project is a project designed to map all one hundred thousand genes in the human genome and know their function. Geneticists say it will be completed by the year 2005. Because of this project geneticists are able to do predictive testing (Cook-Deegan 20). Linkage testing, or indirect testing, is used when the specific location of the gene is unknown, but it can be located within a certain region of a chromosome. This kind of testing however requires additional DNA from affected family members.

Recently people have been able to use direct testing to examine genes or markers placed near the genes for inspection of the mutation. There are always the possibilities of false negatives or false positives when dealing with genetic testing, but these do not happen very frequently because testing is done numerous times, and the lab technicians are highly trained to read the results carefully (ELSI 1).

Doctors have used both of the above techniques to test for Huntington's Disease. The goal was to isolate the gene for the disease. The technique for doing this is called genetic linkage mapping. One defines segments of DNA with chemical markers and then searches between them (Cook-Deegan 18). In 1983, J.F. Gusella and his coworkers found a Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) marker for the Huntington gene on chromosome four. This led to DNA linkage analyses.

These analyses were not always technically applicable because DNA from other affected family members was needed in order to enable geneticists to search for these markers in people, some positive and some negative for Huntington's Disease (Decruyenaere 3). But ten years later in 1993 the Huntington's gene was finally isolated. It was discovered that the cause of the mutation in this specific gene was an expanded number of CAG triplet repeats at the beginning portion of the gene.

Most people have eleven to thirty one repeats, but those with Huntington's Disease have more than thirty eight of these triplets. Those whose number of triplets fall between these two ranges are known as "sporadic cases" because doctor's can't be sure whether they have the defective gene or not.

Those with juvenile onset tend to have more triplets than those who get the disease later in life. This time of onset is also related to the sex of the parent from whom the gene was passed. Those who do get juvenile Huntington's usually inherit the gene from their fathers, and those who develop symptoms later in life usually inherit the gene from their mothers.

The RNA carrying the mutated Huntington gene is found in all organs of the body, but is most commonly found in the brain, and it is eventually translated into the protein huntingtin (Furtado 9). This explains why there is neuronal degeneration in the basal ganglia and cerebral cortex which results in death fifteen to twenty years later (Decruyenaere 2).

Doctor's treat chorea by prescribing neuroleptics, such as haloperidol* or tetrabenazine, which help suppress these abnormal movements. They are also able to treat the psychiatric problems, but there is currently no treatment aside from symptomatic relief because there is currently no cure for Huntington's Disease (Furtado 10).

Although there is no cure for this disorder, presymptomatic testing is still available for those who want it. Pre- and post-test counseling sessions are required though if the patient decides he or she wants to go through with the testing.

Counseling is provided before and after the testing for the patient to make sure this is what he wants to do and have the ability to deal with the emotional burden that accompanies genetic testing. What is the approach that most genetic centers take when dealing with these tests?

There is a center for Human Genetics in Leuvan, Belgium which takes on a multi-disciplinary approach to testing. A genetic counselor, a social worker or nurse, a psychologist, a psychiatrist, and a neurologist are the people involved (Decruyenaere 5). There is a certain guideline which they follow when administering these tests. In the initial intake session the patient goes over his or her family history. Expectations of the test, assessment of the genetic risk of the patient, and information about the test, as well as the basic protocol of the test are also discussed in this stage.

The next stage is the psychological evaluation and decision counseling. Here the patient talks about the burden Huntington's Disease has been to their family, and the role of genetic risk in the testee's life. The patient will explore his or her motivations for taking the test, the potential impact of the results, and the coping mechanisms and means of support that the patient has available. Afterwards there is a neurological examination.

The third stage is a meeting with all members of this "predictive testing team". They evaluate all the data on their patient and note the final things which need to be discussed before administering the test.

Then there is the last pre-test counselling session in which all relevant items with regard to the test are discussed. The individual makes a final decision to either withdraw from the testing, or postpone it, or to continue with the testing in which case a blood sample is drawn and the DNA is analyzed.

The results are shared with the patient, and then there are a series of follow-up visits to keep track of the emotional stability of the individual.

For those who test positive for the Huntington gene there are phone calls throughout the first week, and then follow-up sessions after one week, one month, three months, one year, and are then continued on a yearly basis.

For those testing negative there are post-test counselling sessions after one month, one year, and finally five years (Decruyenaere 6-7).

There is a need for all this counseling before and after the testing because predictive testing for Huntington's Disease is a complicated and confusing process. There are many questions left to be answered. And there are many other ethical considerations to acknowledge as we dive into the unchartered territory of genetics.

The purpose of medical genetics "would be to take into account the interests and expectations of at risk people and provide them with information and support which would enable them to make informed decisions in all areas of their lives, including founding a family, but also in other personal and professional matters" (Terrenoire 81).

But there are ethical, legal, and social issues involved with genetic testing. First one must make sure that there is informed consent. That means that the patient undergoing the testing must understand everything about the test: risks, benefits, effectiveness, and alternatives to testing, and agree to be tested.

There is also the issue of confidentiality. The individual being tested has the right to privacy, and access to a person's genetic information should be limited to those who have authority to receive it (ELSI 2).

Secondly, one must ask a series of questions:

  • Is it ethical to test for diseases in which there is no cure?
  • Doesn't a person have the right to know their own genetic destiny?
  • What are the harms?
  • The benefits?
  • What are the psychological consequences of being tested and not being tested?
The answers to these questions are ambiguous which is why the issue of genetic testing for Huntington's Disease is constantly being debated.

What are the psychological effects due to this type of testing?

According to the New England Journal of Medicine, testing has potential benefits for psychological health for both high risk (those with a positive test) and low risk people (those with a negative test) which are better than those people without any results (Sandi 1404).

There was a study done by the Canadian Program of Genetic Testing in which the psychological changes were measured of those people who were at high risk for the gene, those at low risk, and those with no change in risk (this could be either because they opted not to take the test or the test results were inconclusive).

The psychological changes were observed at two different times: a follow-up session immediately following the testing, and another session one year later. At the time of the first consultation, there was no significant change in the degree of depression for those who tested positive; there was a lower degree of depression amongst those who tested negative, and there was an increased degree among those who had no change in risk.

After twelve months both the high risk and the low risk groups had a greater sense of well being than the third group (Sandi 1402). This proves that, although there may not be ethical justification for giving people information about Huntington's when there is no cure, people have a sense of anguished uncertainty that is relieved when they discover their test results.

Whether the results are good or bad does not seem to affect the psychological outcomes of the patients as much as having or not having the information does.

The reduction of uncertainty is a huge issue when dealing with the benefits of predictive testing for Huntington's Disease. But there are others as well.

Once an individual has discovered whether she has the gene for Huntington's Disease she can start preparing for her future. She can begin to make plans regarding marriage, having children or informing children of their risks, planning her career, buying a home in a certain location (maybe one near a hospital or nursing home) or a certain type of home (one story for easier mobility), and also make decisions about health, life, and disability insurance. There are financial arrangements to be taken care of, as well as funeral arrangements.

A person who tests positive for the gene before symptoms occur will have time to develop a good support system. There are numerous support groups for those who have any risk of the disease as well as for family members and friends. These groups can also provide referrals for specific services and care when needed.

And lastly, when people learn of their futures, and know that because of a certain condition their lives will be short-lived, they tend to live the rest of the normal lives they have to the fullest. "They develop a greater sense of clarity about their lives. Realizing that time is fleeting, they are able to prioritize their lives, and let go of things that are trivial and insignificant. [And] People who test negative can have these same revelations" (Drellishak 1).

But, even though there are benefits to testing there are places where geneticist have learned to draw the line. It is presently inappropriate to test children for Huntington's Disease because of the repercussions in raising the child (Furtado 11). There is no cure, and therefore no medical advantage for testing so young; it has been agreed upon that testing should only be sought by those mature enough to give informed consent. "We find it difficult to envisage a situation which would justify presymptomatic testing for Huntington's Disease in a child too young to provide consent" (Craufurd 1406).

Just as people see the harms in testing for this disease on children, others see harms in testing for this disease at all. Testing will not save lives; there are issues of false positives and false negatives; it's too expensive; there is the potential for extreme emotional trauma, and the results may lead to different kinds of discrimination (Nowak 465).

First of all there is nothing one can do with the results of his or her test once they obtain these results because there is currently no cure. The test results are irreversible. No medical advantage can come from testing for the gene.

Secondly, guessing is not completely eliminated by the test. It yields a gray area in which five percent of people tested are unable to get definitive results. Plus even though people who test positive will know they will eventually get Huntington's Disease they still cannot be sure exactly when the symptoms will begin to appear or how severe they will be.

Third, testing is very expensive. In the United States the cost of lab fees, neurological examinations, and psychiatric and genetic counseling can cost close to one thousand dollars. Is this type of testing for a disease without any cure worth that kind of money?

Another concern is that extreme emotional trauma will be a potential outcome for people with both positive and negative results. Although tests show the psychological consequences are beneficial, no one knows for sure how he or she will react. Those who test negative may react with what is called "survivor's guilt", and those with a positive test may slump into a deep depression because they have a fear of death which now looms above them.

Lastly is the risk of discrimination. If the results of your test go into your medical record or onto your insurance forms there is a risk of being discriminated against in regards to life and health insurance policies as well as jobs (Drellishak 1).

Insurance companies restrict at risk people through rate hikes, exclusive clauses or flat out denials, and as genetic testing becomes more prominent, this type of discrimination will grow.

Employers don't want to hire people who will put a strain on their health care plans or whose dependents might. They may also be concerned with the candidates ability to do his or her job if they know this person will develop Huntington's Disease by the age of forty. What company wants to hire a young man at the age of twenty five when they know he will only be of use to the company for fifteen more years. The company will want to hire someone who will be able to stay with the company for a longer period of time to avoid having to retrain another employee.

But does that make discrimination right? Of course not. According to Nancy Wexler, a woman living with the potential of this disease, companies should hire on proficiency, because it's the here and now which is important (Cook-Deegan 22).

The here and now may be important, but it is the future into which we are constantly looking. The future reams with possibilities, and the Human Genome Project is making these possibilities a reality. There is a quote that says, "Knowledge brings power." Does this mean as a society we should strive to know everything? Or should some things remain a mystery? Do scientists have the responsibility to discover everything, or should some things be hidden forever? Knowledge may bring about power, but is that power necessarily right? Is that power beneficial to humankind? Or should that power be left untouched? Should it remain in the hands of a higher being?

With technology making improvements every day, we can't let these questions go unanswered. In my opinion in order for our society to grow, we must not impede technology. If people want to be tested for the gene which causes Huntington's Disease, they should be allowed to do so; they should have the right to these test if technology is making them possible.

We can't discover new things if we leave things untouched, unexplored. We can't make improvements. Although we may be happier not knowing the risks we run, it would in general seem better that people made their decisions on the basis of knowledge rather than from ignorance.

* Update 2003:

For current medications to treat the symptoms of Huntington's Disease, please see the Physicians Guide to the Management of Huntington's Disease, 2nd Edition - Physicians Guide To HD

Works Cited

1. Ball, David, and Harper, Peter. "Presymptomatic testing for late-onset genetic disorders: lessons from Huntington's Disease." Faseb Journal 6.10 (July 1992): 2818-2819.

2. Robert Cook-Deegan. "Private Parts." The Sciences 34 (March/April 94): 18-23.

3. Craufurd, D., et al. "Testing for children for `adult' genetic diseases." Lancet 335.8702 (June 9, 1990): 1406.

4. Decruyenaere M., et al. "Predictive Testing for Huntington's Disease: Risk Perception, Reasons for Testing and Psychological Profile of Test Applicants." Genetic Counseling 6.1 (1995): 1-13.

5. Drellishak, Renee. "Genetic Testing." World Wide Web. http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/~rd13/hd/testing.html.

6. ELSI. "What is Genetic Testing." World Wide Web. http://www.lbl.gov/Education/ELSI/genetic-testing.html.

7. Furtado, Sarah, and Suchowersky, Oksana. "Huntington's Disease: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Management." Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 22.1 (Feb 1995): 5-12.

8. Nowak, Rachel. "Genetic Testing Set For Takeoff." Science 265.5171 (July 22, 1994): 464 467.

9. Saltus, Richard. "Genetic Clairvoyance." Boston Globe 8 January: 1995.

10. Sandi, Wiggins, et al. "Psychological Consequences of Predictive Testing for Huntington's Disease." New England Journal of Medicine 370.20 (Nov 12, 1992): 1401-1405.

11. Terrenoire, Gwen. "Huntington's Disease and the Ethics of Genetic Prediction." Journal of Medical Ethics 18.2 (1992): 79-85.